This article was written
almost 10 years ago. He seemed exaggerated to some people at the
time, but reality shows us that he was rather understated. Since many
new and, above all, younger readers have been added to this list, I
think it is important to publish this article again. And this time
even in English.
Never
fascism again? We're in the middle of it!
Einar Schlereth
Published 2009 by
Tlaxcala
This article was
written almost 10 years ago. He seemed exaggerated to some people at
the time, but reality shows us that he was rather understated. Since
many new and, above all, younger readers found their way here, I
think it is important to publish this article again.
In view of the Nazi
and fascist phenomena, intellectuals from the left-wing and left-wing
liberal spectrum were not only aware that it could have appeared in
this or similar forms in other countries too, but also that it could
have reappeared if necessary. If necessary means, if the ruling
monopoly capitalist-imperialist class feels threatened and its
privileges sufficiently threatened to have to resort to these or
similar methods. The constantly heard warning shout "Never more
fascism!" had the consequence, however, that they stared
hypnotized at the appearance of swastika, National Socialist slogans
and skinheads and did not notice how de facto "fascism"
spread again and is now firmly established in the middle of us. And
by "in the midst of us" I mean the "free" West or
the highly industrialized countries led by the United States of
America (USA). [1]
In order to exclude
errors, I would like to quote the usual bourgeois definition of
fascism according to Meyer's Great Pocket Encyclopaedia of 1987: "The
ideology was characterized by antimarxism, anti-liberalism,
militarism and exaggerated nationalism." According to the same
source, "fascism, according to the Marxist view, constitutes a
new kind of fascism applied in bourgeois democracies in economic or
political crisis situations. Fascism makes it possible to dismantle
workers' parties and trade unions, reduce labour costs and increase
profitability". Another characteristic of fascism is the
principle of leadership, mass party and one-party state. However,
this is, as will be shown, of secondary importance. There is no
problem without these principles, and the United States is the best
example of this. It is not for nothing that Hitler saw the USA as a
role model in many respects.
The USA, along with
Russia and Australia (Canada as a quasi 51st state of the USA, you
don't have to mention it) is the country that was not decolonized
after the upheavals of World War I and World War II. The reason is
simple: the poor, disenfranchised, partially religiously persecuted
people of the Old Continent have dedicated themselves to the
extermination of the rightful owners of the New Continent for
centuries with such devotion and dedication that hardly any remains.
They were thus able to take over an entire continent, i. e. in good
German stealing. One of the great mysteries of history is how a state
can continue to devote itself to the Holocaust with impunity and at
the same time be celebrated as a democracy and constitutional state.
But that is the
case: Every woman/everyone who criticizes the USA must expect
attacks, slander, silence or even the worst. Rolf Winter, former
editor-in-chief of Stern and Geo, wrote the book "Ami go Home -
Pleading for the Farewell to a Violent Country" [3], in which he
proved that the USA is "inherently violent". In a public
discussion in Hamburg, the former mayor of Hamburg, Schulz, did not
denigrate himself to mention the weekly 5 plates and the chocolate
bar in the school meals after the war for the goodness of the USA. Of
course, he refused to answer factual criticism. He didn't and no one
else did. The book was largely hushed up by the media. It was still
sold well.
And that brings us
to two key concepts: the media and their state-run role and despite
of this. This despite of the state, despite of the violence, despite
of the judiciary, despite of the church, despite of he university and
school, and - often enough - despite of parents gives us a glimmer of
hope (the liberation movements in the 3rd world, 1968, today's global
anti-globalization movement, etc.).
The mass media - in particular the press, radio and television - are widely considered to be a sort of counterbalance to state omnipotence. However, this view has been exposed time and again as a myth. To give you just a few examples: As early as 1866, Heinrich Wuttke published the book entitled "Die deutsche Zeitschriften und die Entstehung der öffentlichen Meinung" [4], in which he exposed the decay of the German and Austrian press and its connection with advertising. In 1918, Upton Sinclair wrote his monumental work "Brass Check", which was published in 1919 and 310,000 copies were sold within a year. And it was sold, even though, like his earlier work "The Profits of Religion", it was hushed up by the entire American press. "Brass Check" was translated into German by Prof. Dr. J. Singer and published in 1921 in an abbreviated form under the title "Der Sündenlohn" in Leipzig. I cannot say anything about the success or failure of this edition, only so much: Although the high American editions show that the book was read eagerly in the underground, it is as good as unknown even among intellectuals on both sides of the Atlantic to this day.
After that, the flow
of radical media criticism continued unabated. Among the most
important critics are Günter Anders, Noam Chomsky, Eduardo Galeano,
John Pilger, Neil Postman and many others. [5]
But reality shows
that the alternative media in which the truth was (and is) given a
chance were (and are) of marginal importance at all times. The media
monopolies that have existed for more than 100 years (the Hearst,
Huck, Hugo Stinnes, Springer, Murdoch & Co.) have with God and
above all the state's help and with the methods of defamation,
concealment, blackmailing, murder and manslaughter eliminated,
rendered harmless or void and ineffective all opposition opinions.
 |
|
|
Once,
however, there was a qualitative leap. After the Russian October
Revolution, there have been attempts in Europe and many other
countries of the world to create a genuine opposition and a genuine
alternative media landscape to be taken seriously (in Germany, for
example, the "Münzenbergkonzern"). However, this was done
in connection with oppositional mass movements, which became
particularly strong in Germany. And so the above-mentioned crisis
situation was given.
The
international bourgeoisie (i. e. high finance and industry from
Wallstreet and Ford to the German chemical, steel and financial
magnates) in union with the high nobility and petty bourgeoisie
cultivated the housepainter from Austria (in Italy it was Mussolini,
in Spain Franco, in Portugal Salazar), who then came up with lies,
hypocrisy, slander, threats, and rapped hard the German working
population. And yet he suffered a severe defeat in the last "free"
elections in 1932 (two million votes lost), and the reins had slipped
out of his hand by a hair. Hindenburg was the savior out
of trouble,
who handed over the chancellorship to this foreign
criminal.
As
is well known, he solved the problem of the opposition with murder,
manslaughter, concentration camps and mass destruction. If, however,
he had dedicated himself to the destruction of the Soviet Union and
the Communist Party alone, in accordance with his mandate, no cock
would have croaked after the millions of murdered Jews, democrats,
gypsies, gays and communists.
At
the end of the Second World War, the USA stood in the "free
West" as the economic and political power and, in terms of world
politics, as a superpower. [6]
And henceforth, the completely different methods of exercising power,
which had been tried and tested in the USA for a long time, were
applied. All oppositional organisations, whether political, trade
union, ethnic or cultural, have always been thoroughly monitored and
infiltrated. Talented and capable guides were "bought in"
or accused, imprisoned or murdered for flimsy reasons. Among the
famous murders are "Chief Buffalo Child Long Lance"(Häuptling
Büffelkind Langspeer) [7],
the first West Point Indian graduate to return home from World War I,
who wrote the history of his life and people and took up the fight
for the rights of his people; Joe Hill, the dedicated singer of
Swedish descent; Sacco and Vanzetti, Martin Luther King, the Black
Panthers to name but a few. For instance, according to a recent
investigation, ten death sentences in the United States still lead to
seven murders of justice.
On
the other hand, the media in the United States has always exercised
enormous power, a power in the service of the state. The American
people are subjected to a constant, tireless brainwashing, the aim of
which is to eliminate all independent brain activity. To the mixture
of washing powder is added a good portion of bible extract, a good
whitener and softener (copied from the Jewish people): "We are
God's chosen people". This is very practical, because: Can God's
chosen people be bad, do something bad, think bad at all? Of course
not. "It is quite clear that the myth of uniqueness brought with
it the myth of superiority," writes historian Henry Steele
Commager of Columbia University, NY. [8]
And just like the Old Testament people, the American people have
been on the warpath from the very beginning, exterminating one nation
after another with women, children and the elderly - for the greater
glory of God, as it is written. The permanent state of war continues
to this day.
 |
| American Progress, work by John Gast (1872), an allegory of the "Manifesto Destiny": Columbia, the embodiment of the USA, leads civilization to the west at the head of the settlers by creating telegraph lines, with fleeing wild animals and Indians, who are probably afraid of the book (bible, constitution, penal code or real estate book?) in the hands of the goddess. |
The
"war" against the Indians lasted almost 300 years. I quote
Rolf Winter once again:"The settlers - heroes of the nation and
hereditary heroes of their values to this day - civilized with the
weapon and carried out the "manifest destiny", i. e.
penetrating and taking possession of the semi-continent, with
cold-blooded determination. They anticipated Hitler, whose
"providence" was a late equivalent of the "manifest
destiny" and whose barbaric treatment of other races was a copy
of the treatment of the Indians by the white European/Americans. As
the French historian de Riencourt wrote, they "pushed aside all
the people who stood in their way" as if they had already
marched to the lyrics of Nazi songs, and yet another quote from
Winter: "It is possible that no other factor had such a
brutalising influence on the American character as the wars against
the Indians. The norms of these wars were more barbaric than those of
the wars of Western Europe." [9].
The
conclusion: Of the approximately 18 million Indians, only 5% survived
at the end of the war (1890), or 360,000 people.
But
these 300 years of extermination and robbery were far from over when
the Gringos began to turn their desirable glances to the wider
environment and started waging "real" wars. During the
Mexican War (1846-48) Mexico was robbed of one third of its territory
(of course, the Indians were robbed by the Spaniards). In 1848, the
southern part of Oregon, today's Washington, Idaho and parts of
Montana as well as Alaska) were "taken care of" in disputes
and fraud against Spain, Russia and Great Britain. In 1819 Florida
was "taken away" from the Spaniards. In 1854, Japan was
forcibly opened up to American trade. In 1852, the Monroe doctrine
was formulated, which, among other things, declared all of Latin
America to be the "American backyard", which resulted in
countless American interventions. 1898 war with Spain: Puerto Rico,
the Philippines, Guam is annexed, Cuba declared protectorate. In 1903
Colombia was robbed of Panama etc.
During
the First and Second World Wars, the USA continued to strengthen its
political, military and economic supremacy. And since the end of
World War II, the United States has carried out extremely serious
interventions (or wars) in 70 countries, including China, Korea,
Vietnam and most recently Iraq and Afghanistan, to name but a few.
[10]
It
may be difficult to find only one year without war in the 400-year
history of the United States (starting with the Pilgrim Fathers).
Winter's wording of the "incapable of peace" imperial power
is thus fully justified.
When
in 1989, after countless interventions, obstructions, undermining,
terrorist attacks, media smear campaigns, the goal of destroying the
USSR, which had been envisaged since 1918, was finally achieved, the
arbitrariness, self-assertion, arrogance, threats, acts of violence,
violation of national and international laws and disregard for the
international community took on monstrous forms.
First
of all, a new world enemy number one was created in no time at all, a
new "kingdom of evil" was constructed - Islam or the Umma,
i. e.. the Islamic international community. Anti-Semitism was once
again put into the system (who should not know: the Arabs are Semites
and the Jews are a brother people). A smear campaign of unimaginable
proportions was spurred on by the USA, into which almost all western
media tuned in unison.
And
in 1991 it was time. The first war was started by Bush Senior. The
victim was Saddam Hussein, who had been supported directly beforehand
against the Iranian arch-enemy. Suddenly a man of Hitler's "format",
who was stupid enough to run into the open knife of the USA. He had
summoned the American ambassador and knocked on the bush to see if
there was anything in Washington that would have been against the
occupation of Kuweit. The answer was: NO.
Even
though this news was only broadcasted once and then disappeared for
ever, it was still well known in all state chancelleries all over the
world. Nevertheless, almost all statesmen and (almost) all media
accepted the occupation of Kuweit as a reason for war. This
flirtation of our statesmen and the Journaille mocks every
description, but should be surpassed by far in post-war attitudes and
"war-reporting" and post-war attitudes. This wasn't a war,
it was a remote-controlled slaughtering of soldiers and civilians.
Nevertheless, the "journalists" drooled and wet their pants
with joy at the "successes" and the "courage" of
the Gringo soldiers. Even ordinary people and so-called leftists
became ardent Hurra-US patriots overnight.
After
this success and the unrestricted support of the international
community and the comprador bourgeoisies of the 3rd world, the USA
was able to devote itself calmly to the preparation of the next
tasks. Quite all the international treaties that stood in the way of
their interests were thrown into the wastebasket [11].
Figures such as Brzezinski [12]
determined the further marching route to consolidate the absolute
supremacy of the USA. Above all, in view of the dwindling energy
supplies, it is important to gain control of the remaining resources
and their access routes. Especially in South America and Central
Asia.
The
first option was the Balkans. There, all the former Eastern bloc
states had thrown themselves whorishly into the arms of Western
capital and NATO, all but Yugoslavia. The EU - above all Germany,
which for years has been in the forefront with the help of Ustascha's
undermining - the USA and NATO embarked eagerly on the destruction of
Yugoslavia and its democratically elected government. International
law, UNO, human rights - everything was pushed aside sovereignly,
once again the medial steamroller was used to prepare for the
deployment of the US Air Force. And once again everything went like
clockwork. Everyone was marching and finally the Germans again, what
the former green pacifists had made possible. Yugoslavia was shredded
and bombed 100 years into the past, but the pipeline to the Caspian
Sea was free. It was worth fighting for this freedom.
At the same time, political, social and military conflicts escalated in Latin America. It was boiling from Mexico to Argentina, and the USA had its fingers in every pot, just as it had since Bolivar's times.
At the same time, political, social and military conflicts escalated in Latin America. It was boiling from Mexico to Argentina, and the USA had its fingers in every pot, just as it had since Bolivar's times.
In
the south of Colombia, new, extremely rich oil wells have been
discovered, unfortunately located in the area controlled by the FARC
(the largest liberation movement in the country). Thus, a slanderous
campaign is being launched against the FARC, which for 30 years has
been striving for political independence from American patronage and
social justice, and, already in Clinton's term of office, a "care
package" has been put together that contains billions of
dollars, advanced weapon systems, military advisers and pilots,
allegedly to combat the drug mafia.
Word has got around, however, that the drug mafia is only of secondary importance. The truly guilty parties are the consumer countries, i. e. the highly industrialised countries and above all the USA. The so-called war on drugs has not led to the slightest reduction in drug use, but the exact opposite. It is also well known that the Colombian government, its gangs of manslaughterers and American soldiers are deeply involved in the drug trade and are also among the worst human rights violators. But the Western press is slavishly praying after what the White House and CIA spokespersons have preached. And since then, the war against the Colombian people, especially the poorest of the poor and the minorities (U'waa) [13] has been escalating day by day. [14]
In Ecuador, the powerful CONAIE (Association of Indigenous Peoples) together with the impoverished masses and progressive military forces in a peaceful revolution overthrew the government that had sold the country out to the United States and set up a Revolutionary Committee. Barely 24 hours later, in response to strong pressure from the United States (you can imagine what kind of pressure it was), this committee had to leave and the vice-president Noboa took over, who is continuing the old policy.
Word has got around, however, that the drug mafia is only of secondary importance. The truly guilty parties are the consumer countries, i. e. the highly industrialised countries and above all the USA. The so-called war on drugs has not led to the slightest reduction in drug use, but the exact opposite. It is also well known that the Colombian government, its gangs of manslaughterers and American soldiers are deeply involved in the drug trade and are also among the worst human rights violators. But the Western press is slavishly praying after what the White House and CIA spokespersons have preached. And since then, the war against the Colombian people, especially the poorest of the poor and the minorities (U'waa) [13] has been escalating day by day. [14]
In Ecuador, the powerful CONAIE (Association of Indigenous Peoples) together with the impoverished masses and progressive military forces in a peaceful revolution overthrew the government that had sold the country out to the United States and set up a Revolutionary Committee. Barely 24 hours later, in response to strong pressure from the United States (you can imagine what kind of pressure it was), this committee had to leave and the vice-president Noboa took over, who is continuing the old policy.
In
Bolivia, the totally impoverished rural population is driven into
naked despair. The protest marches and hunger marches are answered
with bullets and torture.
Argentina
is being driven into bankruptcy by the WMF. The formerly strong
middle class is largely pushed to the edge of the subsistence level.
Three governments are overthrown, but like in the Punch and Judy
theatre, the Punch is always standing in its old place undamaged.
Mexico
was forced to join NAFTA [15]
and the mass of the people are in free fall in social terms.
Thousands of them are trying to overcome the wall to the USA in
search of work, many of them dying. Of course, we must not speak of
those shots at the wall.
The
list of countries affected by the US imperialism could be extended at
will. The only glimpses of light are Cuba and, above all, Venezuela,
where Chávez won landslide victories in the past elections. He has
finally embarked on the land reform (amongst many other reforms)
promised 100 years ago.
Of
course, the USA is foaming with anger and is naturally preparing
certain measures. Quite a few people predict for Chavez the fate of
Allende. However, since Chavez is probably not as naive as Allende,
this kind of problem solving seems to be associated with certain
risks.
On
the other side of the globe, more precisely in Central Asia, the
seizure of lucrative oil fields is also making determined progress.
Only the future transport proved to be problematic. The Western route
from the Black Sea to Romania, Kosovo and Albania is considered the
safest route for a pipeline, following the settlement of the Balkan
question. But this one is expensive. The other and cheaper
alternative would be the route through Afghanistan, if..... Well, if
"reasonable" conditions could be created there. It has been
said that the oil industry has given the American Government a kind
of ultimatum. But following Brzezinski's argumentation, it was not
necessary. The tasks of government and monopolies coincide, as John
Pilger says. In any case, the American armed forces have been
preparing for the invasion of Afghanistan since 2000.
At
about the same time, if not sooner, all Western intelligence services
will learn about planned terrorist attacks in the USA. And that's one
of the darkest chapters in the history of the United States. The
Secret Services were probably working together with the terrorists.
The future will show how and in what form this "cooperation"
took place [16].
It is conceivable that the deadlines could be coordinated in such a
way that they coincided with the operational readiness of the armed
forces. History repeats itself once again. The American President
Roosevelt also knew about Pearl Harbor and did nothing [17].
This gave him the perfect pretext for intervening in World War
II.[18]
Meanwhile,"elections"
were held in the USA. These have always been a parody of democracy
(with just under 50% turnout and an undignified bark between two
parties, which could hardly be distinguished from each other, whose
common denominators are always the millionaire candidates.), the past
elections have mocked every description. Consequently, the "winner"
of thinking people is not called "president elect" but
"president select".
The
"Winner" was only in office for a few months, when he was
already counted out. The economy was experiencing a rapid downturn,
social tensions were growing, foreign policy was in shattered form,
and plenty of people were full with anger and abhorrence at the
usurper.
The
rescue was September 11th. Before that, the gigantic secret services
of the USA with their billion-dollar budgets had supposedly not been
aware of anything, but now, barely 48 hours later, the perpetrators
and also the mastermind and also the country that housed him were
suddenly known and therefore guilty [19].
However, a few weeks later, the most powerful war machine the world
has ever known was set in motion against the world's poorest country,
a country that has also fought 20 years of war against another
superpower, and as a result of which it has gone through a civil war.
And
overnight, the ZERO in the White House became a genius statesman. His
threat "Whoever is not with us is against us" made almost
all the world's heads of state crawl to the cross. The media were
even more closely brought into line (again, another revolution is
possible), and the war cry became deafening.
The
first question I asked myself directly (and publicly) was: Cui bono.
And from this point of view: they must have known it all. In our
village I heard different voices the following day: "Now they
are going to taste their own medicine" - "All my life I
was waiting for it. - I guess they did it themselves." It is
easy to imagine what the reaction of the billions of victims of the
United States was in the rest of the world. [21] In any case, the
real public opinion is diametrically opposed to the chatter in the
media. In retrospect, my question above can be clearly answered:
September 11th used only the United States and Israel - and of course
Bush (and Sharon). And: The war against Afghanistan is not only
illegal for lack of any evidence, but also a crime against humanity
and humanity (as is the war against the Palestinian people).
One
could ignore the universal and systematically remote-controlled media
lies with a shrug of the shoulders if they did not have appalling
consequences for all the peoples of the world. For imperceptibly we
have been driven/pulled into a system that I can only call
new-fascist (the neo-fascists are not new - they only spoon the old,
warmed-up brown soup). I think that all the circumstantial evidence
support this.
a)
An all-dominating anti-Semitic and generally racist "ideology",
the basis of which (not necessarily pronounced) is the white,
Christian yardsticks of value [22].
b)
Unlimited equalisation of the media to an unprecedented extent
c)
Enforcement of US cultural imperialism
d)
Unification of the opposition and its criminalization (FdgO laws,
raster search [23],
bullying of Swedish and British citizens on orders from the United
States [24],
more than 1000 American citizens arrested without charge, etc.).
e)
Equalisation of trade unions. They are so corrupt and cowardly that
in 100 years they have not managed to establish fundamental
solidarity, such as equal pay for equal work for men and women and
the right to work (the unemployment nowadays is a disgrace - f. ex.
it could be solved overnight if only overtime were to be abolished).
f)
The elimination of the UN and international law
g)
Abolition of binding international treaties
h)
Abolition of formal democratic rights [25]
i)
the elimination of national sovereignty in the EU Member States [26]
j)
Replacement of law and order by arbitrariness and naked violence of
US imperialism [27]
k)
Total deprivation of power and supervision of the individual in
industrialized, western societies
l)
Profits have risen to unprecedented heights, while wages have fallen
(USA and the whole of the 3rd world) or have risen only marginally
As
you can see, they don't give a straw for the symbolism of old
fascism, for the mass parties or gigantic marches, for the simple
reason that they no longer needs all this or because it has become
obsolete (the mass armies). Nevertheless, the results are the same.
And one has learned from the Catholic Church. She always gave a damn
at whether someone really believes; the important thing was to be in
the church and to pay.
Accordingly,
you let the masses of people grumble and moan a bit, let them
demonstrate a little bit, let them have one or the other media niche
(a few leaflets with a few thousand copies or a local radio station
that doesn't go beyond the next cow village), but above all give them
"bread and games", whereas one forgets the bread more and
more often. But as soon as a movement becomes too massive and its
criticism too dangerous, it is criminally crushed and destroyed (see
Seattle, Gothenburg, Davos, Genoa, etc.); as soon as leaders appear
who are a real challenge and thus a danger for the established
powers, they are imprisoned, exiled or murdered (Lumumumba, Mondlane,
King, Malcolm X, Dutschke, Black Panthers etc.)
This
situation will not change as long as we remain unaware of it as long
as we are not aware of the dangerousness of US imperialism and of the
bourgeoisie's danger in general and wherever. The bourgeoisie is no
longer innovative these days, but repressive. She betrays her
origins, her country, her people. She's rotten and corrupt to the
core. In order to understand this and do something about it, we need
not only consciousness, but also courage, determination and
solidarity, the virtues that have been decisive in every movement
since time immemorial. Solidarity not only within a nation with all
those who are deprived of power, irrespective of race, gender or
religion, but also solidarity with all the peoples of the world.
In addition, we could learn from Gandhi, for
example, what the weak man can do against the strong man: he has to
hit him where he feels the most painful - at his purse. Just as all
English goods were boycotted in India at that time, we now have to
boycott both US and Israeli goods. Under the motto: Not a penny to
the US-American and Israeli "rogue" regimes [28] and not a
penny for the armies.
[1]
Es gibt durchaus bereits Stimmen, die das ähnlich sehen,
z.B.:
‚Der
Rufer in der Wüste schweigt - vergeblich war die Müh´ Der
Faschismus kommt, der Bürger zieht sich mehr und mehr in seine heile
Welt zurück und der Aktivist resigniert, schaut fasziniert/ungläubig
zu oder seine Emotionen gehen mit ihm durch.
Noch
nie ist ein faschistoides System mit so wenig Gegenwehr etabliert
worden!
Diskussionsteilnehmer
in Indymedia
[2]
Rogner & Bernhard, München 1995
[3]
Rasch & Röhring, Hamburg 1989
[4]
Heinrich Wuttke ”Die deutschen Zeitschriften und die
Entstehung der öffentlichen Meinung. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des
Zeitungswesens”, Leipzig 1866
[5]
John Swinton, vorm. Herausgeber der New York Times, wurde
um einen Toast vor dem angeshenen New York Press Club 1953 gebeten.
Er machte folgendes freimütge Bekenntnis: „Wir sind alle
Prostituierte.“ [Es ist wert anzumerken, dass Swinton der "The
Dean of His Profession" von anderen Journalisten, die ihn sehr
bewunderten, genannt wurde.]
”We
are intellectual prostitutes."
[6]
Siehe dieses aufschlußreiche Interview
mit Gore Vidal:
[7]
gleichzeitig der Titel seiner Memoiren
[8]
Rolf Winter, s.o. S.4
[9]
Rolf Winter, s.o. S. 130-131
[10]
Die vollständige Liste ist in The Guardian v. 12.,19. und
26. Juli 2001 zu finden.
[11]
Siehe vollständige Liste:
Marxist-Leninist-Lists@lists.econ.utah.edu Richard Du Boff ”Rogue
Nation”: The US has established quite a notoriety, becoming the
world's leading rogue nation as far as breaking international law is
concerned. The article below recounts at least 22 ways
(Vertragsbrüche) by which the US is living up to its reputation as
the world's leading terrorist state……….
[12]
Brzezinski, Zbigniew ”The grand chessboard: American
primacy and its geostrategic imperatives”, NY 1997
[13]
WEEKLY NEWSUPDATE ON THE AMERICAS ISSUE #555, SEPTEMBER 17,
2000 <wnu@igc.org>
[15]
The Cuban president was the only one who criticised sharply
the FTAA.
[16]
s. DIE WELT v. 07.12.01 Everybody knew it but the
sensational news was useless. In all the European media I found only
one little not in ‚Le Figaro‘.
[17]
siehe Stan Goff unter Fußnote 19 weiter unten
[18]
The Pentagon has planned before in detail terror attacks on
their own people:
Is
Pentagon Behind the 9-11 Terrorism? American Broadcasting Company
(ABC)
http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/jointchiefs_010501.h
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/InfoTimes/message/1234
FriendlyFire
Book: U.S. MILITARY DRAFTED PLANS TO TERRORIZE
U.S.CITIES
TO PROVOKE WAR WITH CUBA
U.S.
Terrorist General Lyman L. Lemnitzer, shown Jan. 9, 1957, was head of
the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time the plans were drawn up
and presented to the U.S. Secretaryof Defense.U. S. CITIES TO PROVOKE
WAS WITH CUBA
U.
S. Terrorist General Lyman L. Lemnitzer, shown Jan. 9,1957, was head
of the U. S. Joint Chiefs of Staff at the time the plans were drawn
up and presented to the U. S. Secretary of Defense.
[19]
NARCO NEWS published "The So-Called Evidence Is a Farce" by
Stan Goff on 10.10.2001, who taught military science at West Point.
In the article, Stan Goff disproves every single point of all
official announcements from Washington as a blatant lie and pure
bullshit.
[20]
A further refutation can be found in the book of Dr. Andreas von
Bülow "In the name of the state - CIA, BND and the criminal
machinations of the secret services" (Munich 2002). S. a. the
interesting interview with v. Bülow in the "Red Flag" of
14.2.02
21]
John Pilgrims skript i "Green Left": One of Bush and
Blair's oft-repeated lies is that "world opinion is with us".
No, it is not. Out of 30 countries surveyed by Gallup International,
only in Israel and the United States does a majority of people agree
that military attacks are preferable to pursuing justice
non-violently through international law, however long it takes. That
is the good news.
[22]
Racism is also ubiquitous in a country like Sweden. Alexandra
Pascalidou is absolutely right to write that democracy and racism are
incompatible (see her book "Bortom mammas gata").
[23]
The Tyska Polisen's systematic "screening" of Muslim/Arabic
and other students who can be suspected of "terrorism"
continued in high schools and universities.
[24]
Who's the war criminal? The Taliban people and the allegedly al-Qaida
members are held in detention at the American base "Camp X-Ray"
in Cuba, but there is no evidence against them. JOHN PILGER "On
the lawlessness in the aftermath of terror wars".
25]
See this informative interview
with Gore Vidal, 29.3.2001
26]
Sweden, for example, is forced to make its youth as legionaries
available to US imperialism (see Jan Myrdal fib 2/2002)
27]
Howard Zinn, Corruption
of Democracy and the War on Afghanistan
28]
A start has already been made in Norway. See: Classcampen mandag 25.
february, 2002
Hvem
vil stop heleriet?
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen